Articles

Hybrid one-stage Snodgrass–Duckett urethroplasty for severe hypospadias. A five-year institutional experience

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 2 February 2026
108
Views
65
Downloads

Authors

Proximal and complex hypospadias repairs remain among the most technically demanding procedures in pediatric urology, particularly in patients with inadequate local tissue or previous failed reconstructions. This study reports a five-year institutional experience with a single-stage hybrid technique combining the Snodgrass Tubularized Incised Plate (TIP) repair and the Duckett transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty. Between 2019 and 2024, forty-two patients with severe hypospadias underwent hybrid Snodgrass– Duckett urethroplasty at our institution. Patients were categorized as: Group A (n = 12) with 46,XY Disorders of Sexual Development (DSD); Group B (n = 16) with primary proximal perineoscrotal hypospadias; and Group C (n = 14) with multiple failed prior repairs. The proximal urethra was reconstructed using a Tubularized Native Plate (TNP) and the distal segment with a tubularized preputial island flap (Duckett), joined via an oblique anastomosis. Penile curvature correction and ventral coverage were achieved using lateral flaps. Functional and cosmetic outcomes, as well as complications, were recorded prospectively. A glans-tip meatus was achieved in all patients. Cosmetic appearance was deemed satisfactory in all cases. Uroflowmetry was normal in 95.2% (40/42; 95% CI 86.6– 100). Complications occurred in seven patients (16.7%; 95% CI 5.6–27.7), including urethrocutaneous fistula (n = 4), diverticulum (n = 1), and early breakdown (n = 2), all successfully corrected. Median follow-up was 26 months (IQR 18–36). No urethral strictures or meatal stenosis developed during follow-up. The hybrid Snodgrass–Duckett urethroplasty represents a feasible single-stage alter- native for selected severe hypospadias cases, including reoperative and DSD patients, when local tissue is insufficient. The approach combines the vascular reliability of the preputial flap with the stability of the native urethral plate. While results are encouraging, the retrospective design, absence of a control group, and heterogeneity of the cohort limit generalizability. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized functional and cosmetic scoring are warranted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Sweet RA, Schrott HG, Kurland R, et al. Study of the incidence of hypospadias in Rochester, Minnesota, 1940–1970, and a case-control comparison of possible etiologic factors. Mayo Clin Proc 1974;49:52–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(25)16650-0
2. Barcat J. Current concepts of treatment. In: Horton CE, editor. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Clinical Area. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.; 1973. p. 249–63.
3. Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, Lee PA; LWPES/ESPE Consensus Group. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. J Pediatr Urol 2006;2:148–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.03.004
4. Chandrasekharam VVS, editor. Hypospadias surgery: science and art. New Delhi: Thieme Publishers; 2020. p. 1–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0043-193251
5. Snodgrass WT. Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 1994;151:464–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34991-1
6. Duckett JW Jr. Transverse preputial island flap technique for repair of severe hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am 1980;7:423–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(21)01243-X
7. Bracka A. Hypospadias repair: the two-stage alternative. Br J Urol 1995;76:31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07819.x
8. Babu R, Chandrasekharam VV. Meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage repair for proximal hypospadias in the last decade. J Pediatr Urol 2021;17:826.e1–826.e9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.05.014
9. Wang C, Zhang W, Liu P, et al. A new modified Duckett urethroplasty for repair of proximal hypospadias: experience from 121 cases. BMC Urol 2022;22:154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00993-x
10. Gozar H, Hutson JM, Djakovic N. Current perspectives in hypospadias research: A scoping review. Front Pediatr 2023;11:10119991.
11. Hammouda HM, El-Hefnawy AS, Ismail H, et al. The long-term consequences of hypospadias salvage: a single-referral center experience. BMC Pediatr 2024;24:253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04534-3
12. Snodgrass W, Yucel S. Tubularized incised plate for midshaft and proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2007;177:698–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.104
13. Bracka A. A versatile two-stage hypospadias repair. Br J Plast Surg 1995;48:345–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(95)90023-3
14. Joseph V. A combined tabularized/onlay graft technique for total correction of severe hypospadias. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:992–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(99)90775-3
15. Chertin B, Koulikov D, Hadas-Halpern I, et al. Masculinizing genitoplasty in intersex patients. J Urol 2005;174:1683–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000176624.11667.5d
16. Wu Y, Guan Y, Wang X, et al. Repair of proximal hypospadias with single-stage (Duckett’s method) or Bracka two-stage: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Transl Pediatr 2023;12:387–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-75
17. Li J, Liu P, Yang Z, et al W. Reoperation frequency after transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty (“Duckett’s technique”) in treatment of severe hypospadias: a single-center study. Front Pediatr 2023;10:1030649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1030649
18. Zhou W, Li CP, Xia F, et al. Application of a free preputial tube graft coupled with urethral plate urethroplasty combined with a Buck’s fascia integral covering for the single-stage repair of severe hypospadias. Front Surg 2023;9:1047104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1047104
19. Kumar V, Rathore RA, Gangopadhyay AN, et al. Minimizing the postoperative complications of severe hypospadias using a simple technique. Ann Pediatr Surg 2012;8:32–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XPS.0000412347.06720.64
20. Mishra A. Hypospadias surgery: a single-centre study to compare different techniques with special emphasis on transverse preputial onlay island flap urethroplasty. Int Surg J 2020;7:2868–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20203490
21. Gozar H, Bara Z, Dicu E, Derzsi Z. Current perspectives in hypospadias research: a scoping review of articles published in 2021 (Review). Exp Ther Med 2023;25:211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11910
22. Xie Q, Zhao J, Li Q, et al. The effect of staged TIP urethroplasty on proximal hypospadias with severe chordee. Front Surg 2022;9:892048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.892048
23. Chua ME, Silangcruz JM, Ming JM, et al. Risk factors for urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol 2020;16:75.e1–75.e13.
24. Duarsa GWK, Tirtayasa PMW, Daryanto B, et al. Risk factors for urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair surgery in Indonesia. J Pediatr Urol 2020;16:317.e1–317.e6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.04.011

How to Cite



Hybrid one-stage Snodgrass–Duckett urethroplasty for severe hypospadias. A five-year institutional experience. (2026). La Pediatria Medica E Chirurgica, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/pmc.2026.368