Camptodactyly: early nonoperative treatment


Submitted: 17 November 2014
Accepted: 17 November 2014
Published: 31 December 2013
Abstract Views: 1139
PDF: 2520
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

  • G. Pajardi Scuola di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica, Università degli Studi di Milano U.O.C. di Chirurgia della Mano, MultiMedica IRCCS - Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano, Italy.
  • C. Parolo Scuola di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica, Università degli Studi di Milano U.O.C. di Chirurgia della Mano, MultiMedica IRCCS - Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano, Italy.
  • G. Proserpio Scuola di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica, Università degli Studi di Milano U.O.C. di Chirurgia della Mano, MultiMedica IRCCS - Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano, Italy.
  • V. Ponti Scuola di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica, Università degli Studi di Milano U.O.C. di Chirurgia della Mano, MultiMedica IRCCS - Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano, Italy.
  • P. Rossi Scuola di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica, Università degli Studi di Milano U.O.C. di Chirurgia della Mano, MultiMedica IRCCS - Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano, Italy.
  • C. Cargnelutti Scuola di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica, Università degli Studi di Milano U.O.C. di Chirurgia della Mano, MultiMedica IRCCS - Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano, Italy.
Purpose: To analyse the classifications and the conservative protocols used by hand surgery operative’s units and published in the last 15 years. To draw a comparison between those classifications and protocols and the ones used in our unit. Material and Methods: The published conservative treatments have been analysed and then our protocol has been described through the analysis of three cases currently treated in our division. Results: It has been highlighted that camptodactyly classifications are not homogeneous. Moreover, in conservative treatment, different typology and posology of splints have been adopted. Our unit uses the Foucher’s classification to define the type of splint that it is necessary. Conclusions: Despite the authors choose different types of splint, they agree that in the most cases of camptodactily the initial approach is conservative. In our unit static and dynamic splints are made directly on the patient’s hand and they are monitored with goniometrical measurements, obtaining great results.

Pajardi, G., Parolo, C., Proserpio, G., Ponti, V., Rossi, P., & Cargnelutti, C. (2013). Camptodactyly: early nonoperative treatment. La Pediatria Medica E Chirurgica, 35(6). https://doi.org/10.4081/pmc.2013.22

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations